Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Forest Grove board reviews OSAS results and local benchmark strategy in work session
Summary
At an Oct. 22 work session, district leaders and board members examined Oregon’s OSAS state results alongside local benchmarks and cohort data, debating the state exam’s instructional value and outlining steps to use local assessments and quarterly monitoring to guide classroom practice.
District leaders and school board members spent an Oct. 22 work session examining Oregon Student Assessment System (OSAS) results and a suite of local benchmark assessments, with staff urging the board to interpret state tests as a high-level, systemwide measure while relying on local data for instructional decisions.
"OSAS is way up here at the 40,000-foot level," Superintendent Doctor West said, describing the state exam as a systemwide snapshot that does not replace classroom-level measures. Staff presented cohort line graphs showing current seniors catching up to the state by their junior year and highlighted how dual-language programming can predict lower early-grade English scores that later recover.
The board and staff contrasted ‘‘lagging’’ indicators such as OSAS and graduation rates with ‘‘leading’’ indicators — professional learning, formative classroom checks, SEL surveys and three-times-a-year local benchmarks (STAR, MAPS, MCAS and a new ELL tool). Erica, a district leader presenting the benchmarks, said these local measures are used in PLCs, 100% meetings and MTSS processes to set tier 1 instruction and intervention groupings.
Board members raised concerns about test validity and instructional cost. "It doesn't give the feedback to that classroom teacher that school year to help instruction," one board member said of OSAS, citing lost classroom time and opt-outs. Staff confirmed the district tracks opt-out counts and noted a state reporting quirk: OSAS percentages use the entire enrolled population as the denominator, not just students who took the test, which can depress apparent performance.
The district outlined next steps for turning data into action: continued conversations about timing and administration of OSAS, quarterly monitoring conversations with school leaders starting next month to review benchmark, attendance and fiscal metrics, and distribution of family reports so parents see strengths and growth. Staff also gave packets of slide-level data to board members for deeper review.
The work session concluded with agreement to continue refining how the district presents data and to schedule further discussion about using cohort visuals and an advocacy one-pager to explain needs to legislators.
