Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Osba topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hermiston board backs OSBA dues change, rejects caucus creation and related bylaw amendments
Summary
After a phone briefing from an OSBA representative, the Hermiston board voted to support an OSBA dues-schedule amendment (Resolution 1) and voted no on Resolution 2 (creating a member pride caucus and board seat) and Resolution 3 (bylaw amendments); the board discussed costs to small districts and governance concerns and agreed to send a letter explaining its votes.
The Hermiston School District Board voted on three Oregon School Boards Association resolutions during its Dec. 9 meeting after a remote briefing from OSBA representative Chris Cronin.
Resolution 1, a proposal to amend OSBA’s dues schedule, drew support from the board. After discussion about member benefits and the financial impact on small districts, Board member James Hurst moved to approve Resolution 1; the motion was seconded and the board voted in favor by raised hands.
Resolution 2 proposed creating an OSBA member pride caucus and designating a seat on the OSBA board of directors and legislative policy committee for that caucus. Several board members said they feared proliferating caucuses would dilute representation and create potential special-interest influence. James moved to deny Resolution 2; the motion passed unanimously.
Resolution 3 sought broader bylaw amendments that would, among other changes, address parameters for leadership and caucus-related language. Board members said some changes appeared clerical while other elements could alter governance; after discussion the board moved and voted to oppose Resolution 3 as well.
Members emphasized the practical benefits OSBA provides — legal consultation, pooled insurance (PACE) and other services — but said they want the association to revisit how advisory groups and caucuses are formalized. Chair Sally Hansel offered to draft a letter to OSBA explaining the board’s votes and asking for a review of current methods.
