Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves additional design tasks as City Ditch piping project faces railroad easement issues

Englewood City Water and Sewer Board · December 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board authorized additional design and construction‑support work for the City Ditch piping project after staff reported reach‑2 challenges with railroad property rights; proposed additional tasks total about $485,000 with a roughly $48,000 contingency (total ~$534,000).

Peter presented the next-phase work for the City Ditch piping project, which intends to close open-ditch reaches between Chatfield Reservoir and the Allen plant for reasons including aesthetics, resiliency, safety and long‑term capital savings. Staff said reaches 1, 3 and 4 are at or near design completion; reach 2 remains the most challenging due to railroad property-rights limitations.

"We had anticipated putting the ditch in a pipe in the railroad right away. However, we found that the property rights that we would get from the railroad did not meet our needs — they would not give us an easement, only a license agreement," Peter said. Because the ditch dates to the 1870s and carries embedded property-rights, staff said they prefer not to concede property interests to the railroad and are pursuing a realignment while minimizing railroad interface and maintaining contingency plans.

Staff requested authorization of additional design and construction-support tasks with a proposed contract amount of $485,000 and a contingency of approximately $48,000 for a total project authorization of about $534,000. Board members asked which tasks apply only to reach 2 and which cover multiple reaches; staff said some tasks are reach‑specific while others cover construction inspection across all reaches.

A motion to approve the item was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.