Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the TGAA Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council orders review of TGAA membership after public challenge to contract and governance
Summary
After public and council concern about the city's recent TGAA membership and the association's startup status, council created a small subcommittee and instructed staff to collect questions and seek clarifications from TGAA rather than immediately terminating the agreement.
A contentious discussion about the city's membership in the Texas Government Accountability Association (TGAA) dominated the meeting's miscellaneous business. Several council members and members of the public questioned the timing, authorization and legal form of the contract the city executed with TGAA earlier in the year.
Council member Thompson voiced concern that the agreement may not comply with the Texas interlocal contracting statute because TGAA is a new organization and the contract language did not clearly reflect a contracting relationship between municipalities. Concerns raised in public comment included whether TGAA had a board or bank account when the city signed the agreement, whether authorized representatives had the authority to execute the document, and how the city could exit the contract (the agreement as written would require a referendum, several speakers said).
Local attorneys and residents urged caution. Richard McHugh, an attorney in the audience, said the contract's termination clauses and potential referendum requirement could expose the city to cost and litigation. Dallas Kennedy, a resident and critic, said TGAA did not appear to have been fully formed at the time the contract was signed and questioned who was paying the association's legal and administrative costs.
City legal counsel said he was not prepared to declare the agreement illegal but expressed concern that the contract should more clearly fit within Texas Government Code Section 791 (interlocal cooperation) and that further documentation and clarity would be useful. Rather than move to void the contract immediately, council directed a small subcommittee (three members including the mayor and selected council members) and asked the city attorney to compile questions, contact TGAA and report back with clarifications. Several councilmembers asked staff to seek documents (board minutes, bank/account status, signatory authority) and an explanation of the termination process.
What's next: a council subcommittee and city legal staff will gather the public questions posed at the meeting, ask TGAA to respond and report back to council with legal analysis and potential next steps. Council did not rescind the membership during the meeting.
