Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Nuisance Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mineral Wells council narrows animal-feeding ban to city property, allows private feeders

City Council of the City of Mineral Wells, Texas · October 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Mineral Wells City Council amended the animal nuisance ordinance to ban feeding on city-owned property, public parks and vacant lots while preserving an exception for feeders on a person’s own property so long as they do not create a nuisance; the measure passed 5-0.

The Mineral Wells City Council voted Oct. 1 to amend Chapter 18 of the city code to prohibit feeding animals on city-owned property, including public parks and vacant lots, citing public-safety concerns. An unnamed councilmember proposing the change said it was a short amendment meant to protect children and park users from encounters with feral animals.

Councilmembers asked whether the change would affect private parking lots and whether existing definitions in the animal ordinance — including feral cats, domestic and nondomestic wildlife — already addressed the problem. Speaker 4 noted concerns that residents feed deer and suggested carving out an exception for feeders on private property.

On a motion by Speaker 7, seconded by Speaker 5, the council amended the ordinance to allow feeders "used for the sole purpose of feeding wildlife within the boundaries of a person's owned or occupied property," while keeping nuisance enforcement available where feed scatters to neighbors’ property or animals congregate. The motion carried 5-0.

Council members said enforcement would rely on existing nuisance and animal-shelter procedures when conduct on private property created a public nuisance. No changes to criminal trespass or criminal mischief processes were adopted; staff indicated nuisance calls could be routed through the animal shelter and law enforcement as appropriate.

The council did not set an effective date in the meeting discussion; staff said the amended language would be prepared and finalized for execution following the meeting.