Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves consent agenda, SHAC roster, superintendent evaluation instrument and budget amendment

Schertz‑Cibolo‑Universal City Independent School District Board of Trustees · October 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The SCUC ISD board approved the consent agenda, the Student Health Advisory Council roster, the superintendent evaluation instrument, and Budget Amendment No. 1 by unanimous voice votes; action details and next steps are listed.

At its Oct. 17 meeting the Schertz‑Cibolo‑Universal City ISD Board of Trustees approved several routine and governance items by unanimous voice votes.

- Consent agenda: The board approved consent agenda Items A–D by motion and voice vote (motion and second on the record; vote recorded as 6‑0 in favor). No individual roll‑call votes were read aloud.

- Student Health Advisory Council (SHAC): Trustees approved the 2024‑25 SHAC membership roster presented by HR/staff; the motion carried 6‑0.

- Superintendent evaluation instrument: The board approved the instrument staff proposed for the superintendent evaluation cycle (the document incorporates measurable student performance objectives, baseline teacher retention goals and financial metrics); the motion passed 6‑0. Staff noted the teacher‑retention metric is a baseline this year and will be set in future cycles.

- Budget Amendment No. 1: The board approved a budget amendment that re‑appropriates funds for pending purchase orders and authorizes assigned fund‑balance spending totaling about $3.17 million; trustees were told the amendment does not affect the district’s unassigned operating balance. Motion passed 6‑0.

Meeting minutes record the motions, seconds and voice votes; individual trustee‑by‑trustee roll‑call votes were not read into the public transcript during the meeting.