Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workforce topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Task Force approves conceptual workforce package; reframes compensation items as a negotiable toolbox

Transcend Transformation Task Force, California State Transportation Agency · December 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members approved conceptual workforce and training recommendations—adding K–12/reentry recruitment and multilingual statewide outreach—while deferring compensation and bargaining‑sensitive items for further drafting to avoid mandating local collective bargaining outcomes.

The Transcend Transformation Task Force advanced multiple workforce items after a multi‑hour discussion focused on who should implement proposals and the limits of state authority. Hunter Hohens summarized a three‑tier structure (principles, strategies, recommendations) and proposed new principles emphasizing operational sustainability for transit workforces and linking transit to land use.

Key approvals and edits: N1 was amended to explicitly include K–12 systems and reentry programs as recruitment pathways; N3 was broadened to require a statewide recruitment campaign in multiple languages; N4, N6 and N7 were accepted as concepts but staff were directed to prepare clarifications before final recommendations. The motion to approve those conceptual changes was moved by Kate Miller and seconded by Cooney and passed by roll call.

Compensation and benefit proposals grouped under strategy O prompted strong comments from labor and operators, who cautioned that many details reside in local collective bargaining agreements. Members agreed to reframe O1–O9 as a voluntary ‘toolbox’ for operators and voted to table those items for additional stakeholder work and redrafting. Several operators emphasized the need for any state guidance to be ‘opt‑in’ and funded if it is to be adopted into local contracts.

Next steps: staff will return with clearer responsibility assignments and language that preserves local bargaining authority while outlining state fiscal or technical support options. Members were asked to submit written input by January 2 to help craft the draft report for the February meeting.