Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Seguin ISD consultant: proposed 2¢ M&O increase would raise roughly $2.3 million; audit used 2022–23 data

October 30, 2024 | SEGUIN ISD, School Districts, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Seguin ISD consultant: proposed 2¢ M&O increase would raise roughly $2.3 million; audit used 2022–23 data
Seguin Independent School District trustees on Oct. 29 heard an efficiency audit presentation required under House Bill 3 ahead of a voter‑approval election on the district’s maintenance and operations tax rate.

Dr. Amberla Singh, who prepared the audit for Mel Casey, told the board the district is proposing to increase the M&O tax rate by 2 cents to 0.6978, which the presentation estimated would generate about $2,300,000 in additional revenue intended mainly for salary needs across the district. "The district is proposing to increase the tax rate by 2¢ to 69.78," Singh said during the presentation.

The audit compared Seguin ISD to peer districts on enrollment, tax rates and demographics and emphasized how attendance (WADA) and student characteristics drive revenue. Singh noted the figures in the audit use 2022–23 audited data and therefore lag current conditions; she repeatedly told trustees that the efficiency audit provides comparative information for voters but does not formally declare whether a district is or is not efficient.

Key figures presented included a higher share of economically disadvantaged students (about 75% in Seguin ISD vs. 53% for peers), higher expenditures per student in several categories, a district fund balance of approximately $34.5 million versus a required $17.6 million, a teacher turnover rate reported at about 31.6% (higher than peer average), and an average teacher pay near $63,000 compared with $60,000 for peers.

Trustees asked about the selection of peer districts and the timing of ESSER funds in the dataset. Singh and district finance staff noted that ESSER funding in the comparison period inflated federal revenue for many districts and that the efficiency audit methodology requires using the most recently completed audited year, creating a 1–2 year lag.

The presentation materials and the full audit were posted on the district website as required by law; trustees and administration emphasized the audit is for voter information ahead of the tax‑rate election.

What’s next: the district will continue public outreach ahead of the election and use the audit materials in voter information; any formal adoption or use of additional tax revenue depends on voter approval.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI