Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Elected officials debate frequency and format of monthly meetings
Summary
Officials discussed whether to keep monthly elected-officials meetings or only convene when there are substantive agenda items; one participant recommended a roundtable model used in Snohomish County to share departmental updates.
Elected officials at a Kootenai County meeting on Wednesday debated whether to maintain a standing monthly meeting for elected officials or to call meetings only when substantive agenda items require it.
Participants said meetings with few items felt unproductive. One attendee who had worked in Snohomish County recommended a roundtable format with one commissioner invited and brief departmental updates; the speaker said the practice yielded useful information sharing. “We did these in Snohomish County. We only invited 1 commissioner, and then it didn't have to be publicly noticed,” the speaker said, describing a model of short, focused updates from departments.
Officials discussed options including keeping a monthly calendar slot but vetting agenda items in advance, canceling meetings when no meaningful items exist, rotating commissioner attendance, and using the gatherings for budget-cycle planning when appropriate. Several participants suggested maintaining a monthly placeholder on the calendar and calling meetings as needed rather than automatically convening for low-content agendas.
There were no formal votes recorded on changing the meeting schedule; the group reached informal consensus to continue monthly entries but to limit convenings to situations with substantive business. The meeting adjourned at about 9:15 a.m.
