Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation 3 Mile Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakewood Planning Commission adopts 3-mile annexation plan, staff says it does not mean imminent annexations
Summary
The Lakewood Planning Commission on Nov. 19 voted 6-0 to adopt the city's annual 3-mile plan (case PL25-00033), a state-required document that describes how Lakewood would provide services if annexation petitions were filed; staff and commissioners emphasized the plan does not itself initiate annexation.
The Lakewood Planning Commission on Nov. 19 adopted the city's annual 3-mile annexation plan (case PL25-00033) by a 6-0 vote.
Megan Wakefield, an associate planner in the Department of Sustainability and Community Development, told commissioners the plan is a state-required, long-range document that outlines how the city would provide utilities, infrastructure and services to territory within three miles of Lakewood's municipal boundary if an annexation were proposed. "This is not an intent to annex any property tonight," Wakefield said, noting the city had no pending annexation petitions.
The vote came after staff walked commissioners through a map showing the municipal boundary, annexable areas and previously identified annexable enclaves. City staff explained that the designation is typically maintained for decades; staff said some enclave designations predate 2005. City staff also answered repeated public concerns about notice, elections and eminent domain: the city said it has no plans to use eminent domain to acquire residential neighborhoods and that any enclave annexation under state statute would still follow a city ordinance process, including a first and second reading and a 30-day referendum period.
Residents who live in the striped annexable areas attended and spoke during public comment. "I live in unincorporated Jefferson County at this time and would like to remain so," said Joan Poston, who lives in one of the annexable enclaves. Several other neighbors said they were worried about how county wildfire mitigation plans and future zoning could affect their properties if annexed.
Staff explained the different legal paths to annexation: (1) a landowner petition, (2) an annexation election (in which landowners and registered electors in the area vote), or (3) a statutory process that can bring enclaves into a municipality by ordinance; the latter is not automatic in Lakewood because the city requires the ordinance process and public hearings. "Those residents would have ample opportunity to speak to City Council before something like that happened," a city attorney advised during the meeting.
Commissioners expressed sympathy for local concerns but also noted the plan's narrow legal purpose. Commissioner Williams moved to approve the plan as recommended by staff; the motion carried 6-0.
The Planning Commission's adoption of the 3-mile plan is a recommendation to City Council; any actual annexation would require separate legal steps and additional public hearings.
