Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Docks Replacement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board refuses $168,000 postponement charge for schooner dock project; urges staff to work with tenants

Key West Bight Board (City of Key West) · November 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff said contractor estimated up to $168,000 in costs to delay the Schooner floating-dock replacement from January to April 2026; after questioning and offers of storage and negotiation, the board voted to deny approving the $168,000 postponement fee and directed staff to work closely with tenants to minimize disruption.

City staff told the Key West Bight Board that the contractor for the schooner floating-docks replacement estimated up to $168,000 in additional costs if the city postponed work from January to April 2026, citing tariffs, rescheduling of subcontractors and storage needs.

Seaport staff said the contractor had provided a postponement estimate and that moving the project would require re‑sequencing subs and storage arrangements; staff also said the docks had been ordered and could be delivered in November unless the city delayed. A board member and several tenants pressed for an itemized breakdown and suggested negotiating a lower figure or accepting free storage offers to reduce costs.

Board member (motion maker) moved to recommend denying the additional $168,000 cost and the motion carried after discussion. Members emphasized the need to prioritize tenant safety and continuity while also pressing the contractor to justify any claimed damages; staff was directed to continue conversations with the contractor and to identify practical storage or scheduling alternatives to protect tenants and keep the project on track.

What’s next: Staff will seek a more detailed cost breakdown from the contractor, explore negotiated options or storage offers, and pursue scheduling that reduces tenant disruption while protecting the city from unreasonable change‑order costs.