Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines expansion of Erie’s historic preservation program, grants and multi-property projects
Summary
City staff briefed the Historic Review Commission on program priorities including multi-property National Register work for firefighting history and parks, a push to document roughly a dozen recent landmark requests, and grant timelines (CLG, Keystone, DCNR) to support expanded work next year.
City of Erie planning staff used the Dec. 1 Historic Review Commission meeting to lay out the program’s goals, priorities and near-term grant strategy as the department prepares to expand preservation work.
Matthew told commissioners that staff’s immediate focus is city-owned civic resources and multi-property documentation projects (firefighting buildings and parks), and that these efforts are intended to create funding opportunities and technical assistance for local stakeholders. He said the program has seen a heavier workload in the past five months and identified approximately 12 landmark requests or inquiries recently received by staff.
Staff emphasized partnerships and capacity-building: hiring researchers for multi-property National Register nominations, improving public access to archival materials and aligning projects with grant cycles. Matthew listed grant timelines: Certified Local Government (CLG) grants were already open, Keystone grant applications are expected in February and DCNR grants in April, and staff urged commissioners to help with community outreach to strengthen applications.
Staff also described archives and placemaking work — including digitization partnerships — and noted plans to inventory city archival holdings and to prepare public-facing materials. Director Spry summarized that staff prepared a portfolio for the incoming administration to communicate current projects, funding efforts and program capacity.
What was not decided: no funding awards or contractual commitments were approved at the meeting; staff described priorities and timelines and asked for commissioner support in outreach and candidate nominations.
