Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedural Parking Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harrisburg zoning board denies application tied to off‑site parking agreements; applicant may refile
Summary
A different zoning application (2617), continued from Oct. 20 and linked to use of off‑site parking for a place of worship, was denied Nov. 17 because required written agreements authorizing use of parking lots were not submitted; the board said the applicant may refile and staff indicated a refiling fee could be waived.
Get email alerts on the Procedural Parking Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Harrisburg Zoning Board on Nov. 17 denied Application 2617 — continued from Oct. 20 — after the applicant failed to provide written agreements authorizing use of two off‑site parking lots that the application relied on.
Solicitor Michael Connell told the board that no one appeared on the applicant’s behalf and that the board had previously requested an agreement (as part of the sales documentation) allowing the applicant to use parking at 1616 Hurst Street and 1625 Cumberland Street to support a place of worship at 1100 North 17th Street. "That documentation hasn't been received," Connell said, and the record was closed for the item.
Board members discussed whether a denial should be recorded "without prejudice" on procedural grounds; the solicitor said the basis for denial was the absence of the requested written agreements. Staff and members indicated they had sent reminders and that in this end‑of‑year schedule the board might be willing to waive a refiling fee to make re‑submission easier.
The chair moved to deny Application 2617 for lack of required documentation; the motion was seconded and the board voted in favor. The board noted the denial was procedural and that the applicant may refile once the written authorizations are provided.
What happens next: The applicant (identified in earlier proceedings as Abdul Larry) may submit the requested written parking agreements and reapply; staff suggested the fee might be waived in this case but final fee decisions will follow standard office practice.

