Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals panel hears dispute over MCAD filings and timeliness in Francis v. Aban
Summary
Appellate counsel argued a series of MCAD filings and a January 2014 resubmission establish that harassment and retaliation claims were timely or that equitable estoppel applies; the county counsel countered with waiver and summary‑judgment record arguments and raised Rule 403 concerns about extraneous materials.
In Francis v. Aban the Appeals Court considered whether documents submitted to the MCAD and a proposed supplemental appendix demonstrate the plaintiff’s harassment and retaliation claims were timely or whether the claims were waived and properly dismissed on summary judgment.
Appellant counsel Danielle Gill asked the panel to consider a set of documents the superior court…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
