Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Residents urge Ridgecrest to review Flock contract amid claims of out-of-state data sharing
Summary
Public commenters told the city it should audit its contract with license-plate-camera vendor Flock and check compliance with California 'Senate Bill 34,' citing alleged undisclosed sharing with out-of-state or federal agencies and inconsistent search-log reasons.
Ridgecrest — Two residents used the council’s public-comment period on Dec. 3 to call for a review of the city’s contract with license-plate-camera vendor Flock and for stronger safeguards on collected data.
Mike LeCitra told the council that investigations in other California cities have found license-plate data shared with out-of-state and federal agencies in ways that may violate…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
