Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners debate reducing JCPC at-large membership to fix quorum problems; item tabled

Bladen County Board of Commissioners · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board discussed trimming at-large membership on the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council from eight to four to address vacancies and quorum issues; after debate about statutory guidance the board voted to table the proposal for follow-up.

Commissioners debated a proposal to reduce the number of at-large members on the county Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) to improve quorum and operational capacity, then voted to table the proposal for further consideration.

An update from a board member (identified in the transcript as Speaker 3) said the JCPC met on Nov. 6 but now has eight vacancies and is struggling to reach quorum. Speaker 3 described the current process: the board supplies names to the JCPC and the JCPC vets and returns recommendations for appointment. "Right now, we have 8 vacancies," the speaker said, and proposed reducing at-large slots so the committee can function with fewer active members.

Board members referenced a statutory guideline that a county council "shall consist of not more than 26 members" and includes suggested positions but does not mandate every slot. Speakers discussed the trade-offs between meeting statutory composition and reducing the number of at-large members to four. Some members worried about removing positions that statute suggests should be represented; others said cutting at-large spots would be a pragmatic step to regain quorum.

After discussion, a motion to reduce the at-large membership was moved; subsequent procedural action led Speaker 3 to move to table the JCPC item. The motion to table was seconded and carried by voice vote; the board asked the committee to return with recommendations on which membership slots to remove and how to comply with statutory requirements.

What happens next: The JCPC membership item is tabled for follow-up. Board staff and the committee were asked to produce a recommendation identifying which at-large positions could be removed while preserving statutory and programmatic requirements.