Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Person County adopts multiple zoning text amendments to clarify uses and permitting
Summary
The Person County Board of Commissioners on Nov. 18 adopted several text amendments to the planning ordinance to clarify subdivision types, allow multiple-dwelling provisions in certain zones, consolidate permitted-use tables and definitions, and fold junkyard and mobile-home-park rules into the planning code. Staff said changes are language clarifications with no financial impact.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Person County Board of Commissioners on Nov. 18 approved a package of text amendments to the county planning ordinance designed to clarify development review and permitted uses.
Planning Director (staff) told the board the first amendment updates subdivision regulations to better identify subdivision categories and the access required for each type; staff said there are "no regulatory changes" and "no financial impacts" and that the planning board unanimously recommended approval. The board moved and approved the ordinance to amend subdivision regulations as consistent with the Person County and City of Roxborough joint comprehensive land use plan.
A separate amendment updates the land-use table and definitions to explicitly allow "multiple dwellings" in certain residential and Rural Conservation (RC) districts under specified conditions. Staff and the planning board recommended the change to provide clarity; commissioners discussed why some multi-family uses were being changed from by-right to special-use to allow conditions during review. The board voted to adopt the amendment.
The largest package (TA-12-25) consolidated dozens of similar uses in the permitted-use table and revised definitions for retail, construction trade, vehicle and outdoor storage, office/service categories and other uses. Staff said the consolidation aims to reduce redundancy in the table and improve clarity. The planning board had recommended some changes (for example, ambulance services as a special-use permit in residential), but staff presented the board with staff-recommended language; a commissioner asked for clarity on which version (staff or planning board) the board was adopting before the motion. The board adopted the staff version by voice vote.
During the public comment period, Don West, an industrial property owner, urged explicit permission for outdoor storage in General Industrial (GI) areas, saying the county is "on the brink of explosive construction activity" tied to a new power plant and data center projects and that unclear zoning for open storage could delay projects and divert investment. West said buffering and screening standards would still apply.
The board also approved TA-13-25, folding the existing junkyard and mobile-home-park ordinances into the planning ordinance and adding use-specific permit review sections. A commissioner successfully offered a substitute motion changing several site-plan requirements from "shall" to "may" to avoid imposing added costs on applicants; the substitute was adopted and the amendment approved.
Several of the amendments were presented as clarifications of established practice rather than new substantive regulations; staff repeatedly told the board that the packages have no direct fiscal impact. The board handled recusal protocol when a commissioner who works in the construction trades asked to be recused; county counsel advised that employment in the trades does not automatically create a conflict and the commissioner elected to abstain from the vote.
Next steps: staff will incorporate the adopted text into the planning ordinance and the joint comprehensive land use plan consistency statements. The board did not record a roll-call tally in the public transcript; adoption was recorded by voice vote.

