Council to hold workshop after concerns that zoning special-use criteria are too vague
Loading...
Summary
Councilors asked staff to revise proposed Chapter 18.16 objective criteria and scheduled a workshop with the planning board after discussing missing quantitative measures for buffers, setbacks and minimum lot sizes and duplication with APOD protections.
The Richmond Town Council directed staff to schedule a workshop with the planning board to refine proposed zoning changes to Chapter 18.16 after several councilors said the current draft contains vague or non-actionable criteria.
Town staff described the proposed amendment as creating objective criteria for special use permits. Councilors praised the intent of involving the planning board but raised repeated concerns: required landscaping buffers and setbacks are not quantified, minimum lot sizes for some uses appear excessively large compared with existing zoning, and several items repeat protections already included in the APOD (aquifer protection) ordinance rather than referencing that ordinance directly.
A planning-board member urged the council to provide clear guidance and measurable criteria so applicants and the board are not put in the position of making ad hoc decisions during an application hearing. One councilor asked the planner to produce a draft that includes specific numbers (for example, buffer depths and screening types) to reduce litigation risk and to clarify where state licensing requirements belong.
Council members voted to schedule a joint workshop so the planner and planning board can craft a revised draft with concrete, measurable standards before the council authorizes advertising for a public hearing. Staff and the planner said they would return with revised language and that advertising costs favor consolidating amendments into a single public hearing notice.
