Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Panel debates scope and participation for proposed Capitol safety drills
Loading...
Summary
Committee advisers recommended trauma-informed, scenario-based safety drills for legislators, staff and building occupants; members debated whether drills should be mandatory, whether language should refer to buildings rather than bodies, and how to account for large tour groups.
The committee discussed proposed language calling for regular, trauma-informed safety drills and training for elected officials and staff, with advisers urging that rules cover both the types of drills and expectations for participation.
A sergeant at arms advised the committee that the recommendation would require participation in trainings for tenants, staff and legislators as drafted; several members, including Senator Westland and Representative Mueller, said the word "tenant" felt inappropriate for the Capitol context and urged clearer wording to reflect staff, public and constitutional officers. The chair suggested referring explicitly to capital-area buildings assessed by the Axel Group as a starting point for drill coverage.
Judicial advisers described a recent active-threat exercise that combined classroom instruction with scenario-based drills on a sign-up basis; evacuation and shelter-in-place drills were announced and involved those present in the building that day. Senator Westland argued that physically participating in drills is valuable for learning and urged required attendance where feasible; others noted mandatory requirements are difficult to enforce and may be aspirational.
Members discussed logistical issues such as accounting for people after an incident — including school groups — and the need for designated meeting points or manifests so responders can identify who is missing or injured. Tour management was highlighted; committee advisers noted roughly 40,000 children visit the Capitol each year and that tour groups should be considered in planning.
The committee recorded feedback and asked staff to refine drill language and consult clerks and facility partners; no final vote on drill language occurred at the meeting.
