Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Child Welfare Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DFCS reports progress on child‑welfare corrective action plan; public commenter repeats screening allegations

Santa Clara County Children, Seniors and Families Committee · November 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Department of Family and Children Services reported 55% of corrective action plan items complete and pilots in Gilroy and Franklin‑McKinley schools; a public commenter repeated allegations that DFCS failed to secure screenings for her children; the committee received the DFCS update.

The Department of Family and Children Services told the Children, Seniors and Families Committee on Nov. 20 that it has completed about 55% of action items in its corrective action plan (CAP), with another 37% in active progress, and that California Department of Social Services completed a mid‑year review of a sample of cases.

What the department reported: DFCS described on‑site CDSS review of 55 referrals and cases conducted Oct. 7; reviewers found improvements in use of structured decision‑making assessments, documentation of safety plans and escalation where appropriate. Staff reported coaching, small‑group trainings and monthly CAP updates as helpful. DFCS said it actionized safety tools for child‑and‑family team meetings and launched a community pilot in Gilroy with on‑site social‑worker support and Franklin‑McKinley School District launch planned for November.

Why it matters: the CAP was established in response to earlier state findings and is intended to strengthen safety assessment, documentation and case monitoring so children remain safer in their homes or are placed in‑county when appropriate.

Public comment and claim: a public commenter again accused DFCS leadership of failing to secure screenings and named DFCS Director Wendy Kinnear Rausch and others; she urged removal of staff she alleged were unresponsive. DFCS did not provide an on‑the‑record rebuttal to the individual allegation during the meeting but presented CAP progress to the committee.

Action taken: the committee voted to receive the DFCS report; Vice Chair Young and Chair Arenas recorded yes votes.

Next steps: DFCS said it will continue rolling out its communication plan with internal feedback loops, convene employee affinity groups for input and return to the committee with further CAP updates and communications.