Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables Christiansen major subdivision after questions about private roads and easements
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled Major Subdivision MS25-02 (Christiansen Addition) on Nov. 19, 2025, after staff and neighbors raised unresolved questions about access, private easements (Foxborough Trail), and which parties would be responsible for road maintenance.
The Natrona County Planning and Zoning Commission voted on Nov. 19, 2025, to table a proposed major subdivision (MS25-02) that would divide Lot 1 of Meadow Acres No. 4 into two 5-acre lots.
Staff presented the Christiansen Addition as a rural-residential subdivision with potential access from Happy Glen Lane and Silver Sage Lane. The planning office told commissioners the property is approximately 12 miles east of Casper, that soils in the area may require engineered septic systems in places because of faster percolation, and that staff had sent notices to 19 neighboring parcels and received no written comments prior to the hearing.
Applicant Dan Christiansen described a proposed 30-foot easement to provide access from Silver Sage to the proposed Lot 1. Neighbor Mike Steele (13360 E. Highway 2026) testified in opposition, telling the commission that Foxborough Trail is a private access easement, that multiple residences already use the private road, and that the proposed plat could increase traffic, dust and safety concerns if access to Lot 1 relied on nonpublic roads. Steele asked that the record require the applicant to construct a new public access road or restrict access to Happy Glen rather than Foxborough Trail.
Commissioners and staff then described contradictory records: some plats appear to show roads dedicated to public use while other documentation and staff archive searches were incomplete. Commissioners asked staff to trace easement and ownership records back to the highway and to clarify whether the Foxborough Trail corridor is a dedicated public right-of-way or a series of private easements. Commissioners also asked for guidance on whether an Improvement Service District (ISD) or other mechanism would be required or feasible to address road maintenance responsibilities.
Given those unresolved items, the commission voted to table MS25-02 and directed staff to research archived plats and easement documentation, produce a map tracing access back to the nearest public highway, and advise on ISD and road-maintenance options before the item returns to the commission.
What happens next: Staff will return with clarified documentation and recommendations; the item remains tabled until the planning office completes its archival and legal review.
