Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gallery Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tiburon commission approves 2026 gallery schedule, formalizes checklist work for exhibitions
Summary
The Tiburon Heritage and Arts Commission voted Dec. 2 to approve a proposed lineup of upper- and lower-gallery exhibitions and agreed to refine a gallery-management checklist to clarify commissioner duties, marketing expectations and banner specifications.
Get email alerts on the Gallery Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Tiburon Heritage and Arts Commission on Dec. 2 approved a proposed lineup of gallery exhibitions and agreed to refine a formal checklist to clarify commissioner responsibilities for promoting shows, coordinating logistics and managing receptions.
The action followed staff presentation of a draft schedule covering the first half of the gallery year and a discussion of who will be asked to reach out to particular artists. Commissioners reviewed proposed artists, including Tyler Willis, Robert Hightower and Brian Higgins, and debated curatorial logistics for group versus solo shows. One commissioner moved to accept the proposed schedule; another seconded, and the motion passed after commissioners unanimously voiced assent.
The vote concludes the commission’s scheduling work for the near term but leaves several operational details to be refined. Commissioners asked staff to return a user-friendly checklist at the January meeting that would set concrete deadlines (for example, 4–6 weeks lead time), define who is responsible for providing banner images and DPI specifications, and clarify what marketing materials the commission will provide versus what the artist must produce.
Commissioners also discussed placement logistics: the upper gallery typically hosts individual, established artists while the lower gallery emphasizes emerging or underrepresented artists and group shows. That distinction informed debate over whether to subsidize reception food and whether artists showing downstairs should be treated differently when they are solo artists. Staff noted that some shows straddle fiscal years, so reception budgets and food subsidies may be split between years.
The commission asked staff to coordinate further with community partners to ensure scheduling flexibility where group shows or external curators (for example, ICB-represented artists) might prefer alternate months. The motion to adopt the schedule passed during the meeting; the chair noted that no public comment was offered before the vote.

