Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement AML topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada commission approves $7.8 million settlement and strict AML conditions with Caesars Entertainment
Summary
The Nevada Gaming Commission approved a $7.8 million fine and a suite of remedial conditions for Caesars Entertainment after a board investigation found systemic anti‑money‑laundering and know‑your‑customer failures tied to patron Matthew Boyer. The settlement requires enhanced AML controls, mandatory training, a designated AML officer, participation in information sharing, and independent review.
The Nevada Gaming Commission on Nov. 20 approved a stipulation resolving a five‑count complaint against Caesars Entertainment over failures to properly verify a patron's source of funds and to follow AML (anti‑money‑laundering) and BSA (Bank Secrecy Act) procedures.
Under the settlement the commission approved, Caesars will pay a $7,800,000 fine and accept 10 specified remedial conditions including annual AML program reviews, mandatory in‑person training for senior managers and customer‑facing staff, participation in FinCEN information‑sharing, designation and licensing of a person with primary AML responsibility, and an independent AML compliance review within two years.
The Gaming Control Board’s deputy attorney summarized the board’s investigation as finding repeated instances dating back to 2017 in which Caesars failed to adequately substantiate a high‑risk patron’s source of funds and, on multiple occasions, reinstated play after only limited review. The enforcement record showed the patron wagered sizable sums across years; the board concluded those failures amounted to systemic negligence rather than intentional misconduct by front‑line employees.
Speaking for Caesars, executive chairman Gary Carano acknowledged the company’s responsibility and pledged that “we will do everything possible to prevent this from coming before you ever again,” and CEO Tom Reig said the company accepted the conditions and would implement the remedial measures.
The board explained its reasoning in public deliberations: Caesars’ winnings from the patron totaled roughly $2.6 million over the relevant period, and the $7.8 million fine was set at approximately treble those winnings to ensure the regulator’s sanction did not leave the company better off than it would have been without enforcement.
Commissioners pressed Caesars’ counsel and senior executives about the timing and scope of the company’s internal and external remediation, training cadence, and whether third‑party audits had been or would be retained. Caesars said it had elevated AML oversight in its organizational structure, increased AML staffing and spend, had engaged a third‑party expert to review protocols and planned more frequent in‑person training going forward.
A motion to approve the stipulation passed on a roll call vote with a majority in favor (Chair Tagliati — aye; Commissioner Mark Antonis — aye; Commissioner Silver — aye; Commissioner Krolicki — aye; Commissioner Solis Rainey — nay). The settlement resolves the state board’s complaint and imposes the listed fines and corrective measures.
The commission’s action represents one of the largest civil fines in Nevada gaming enforcement for AML program violations and is accompanied by a set of operational conditions the board will monitor going forward.
