Glens Falls Water and Sewer Board approves limited billing relief, tables larger cases for full board

Glens Falls City Water and Sewer Board · December 2, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed multiple high-bill appeals on Dec. 1, approving one-time relief for a 9-unit property and for 39 Prospect Street, while tabling larger relief requests (including 52 LaRose and 348 Lehi/Chapman) pending full-board review and additional documentation.

The Glens Falls City Water and Sewer Board on Dec. 1 considered several high-bill appeals and approved limited one-time relief for two accounts while deferring larger or under-documented requests for the full board.

Board members heard staff and residents explain abrupt spikes in quarterly consumption. At 348 Lehi Street (Chapman), a resident traced a surprise holiday bill to an irrigation timer set incorrectly after a handyman’s work; staff advised the board this pattern shows on meter graphs as a temporary spike. "Not a very nice bill to get for the holidays, does it?" said Speaker 1 during discussion of that account.

The board approved relief for a nine-unit account after staff identified a continuously running toilet in a single unit; repairs brought usage back to normal. Speaker 2 moved to approve the payment arrangement for that account and the motion carried.

At 39 Prospect Street, staff reported an on-site inspection showing a downstairs sink and a toilet that had been repaired; consumption returned to normal and the board approved a one-time credit for the $338.39 overage.

For 52 LaRose (a rental building) staff presented meter-graph evidence showing short periods of very high daily usage—one reading rose above 500 gallons per day—later traced to a tenant’s running toilet. Staff calculated an average-based difference of about $2,216.40. The chair moved to relieve half that difference ($1,108.20), but members raised a quorum/unanimity concern for relief given only three members were present; the board agreed to table that relief and several other larger or under-documented accounts (including 348 Lehi and 112 Crandall) for full-board consideration at the next meeting.

Staff said they will create a spreadsheet to track past relief decisions so future determinations are consistent. Speaker 6 noted the department will continue to send meter technicians to investigate suspected leaks immediately when called by residents.

Votes at a glance

- 9-unit account: motion to approve payment/relief (motion carried). - 39 Prospect Street: one-time relief of $338.39 approved (motion carried). - 112 Crandall Street: consideration tabled for additional review (motion carried to table). - 52 LaRose: motion to relieve $1,108.20 (half the calculated difference) was made but ultimately tabled for full-board review. - 348 Lehi (Chapman): review deferred to next packet due to missing backup documentation.

The board directed staff to assemble full documentation for the tabled accounts and to present a running log of prior relief decisions at the next meeting.