Residents tell council no-parking used for balloon festival should stay temporary; vault-post cost questioned
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
During public comment a resident said temporary no-parking used after the balloon festival worked for events but called a permanent ban "terrible" because it restricts truck access; earlier in the session Sean Heltino asked about the cost of a 'vault post' and was told the cost was "0."
During public comment an unidentified resident said the temporary no-parking measures used after the city’s balloon festival were appropriate for events but objected to removing parking permanently. The speaker said making the restriction year-round would be "terrible," would impede access to their truck and was a disservice to residents who need street parking for daily use.
Earlier in the public-comment period, Sean Heltino identified himself and asked about the cost of a "vault post" and whether it was a one-time or recurring expense. An unidentified respondent answered the cost was "0," and the exchange ended without further council clarification recorded in the transcript.
No formal council response or vote on either the parking policy or the vault-post question is recorded in the provided portion of the transcript; both items were raised during public comment and left unresolved in this excerpt.