Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Pro se appellant argues trial court trimmed statutory tenant claims on eve of trial
Summary
A pro se appellant appealed a nonpayment/possession judgment, asserting the judge dismissed or reframed two statutory counterclaims (eviction by force and unauthorized removal of goods) and quashed subpoenas for his daughter's records without adequate notice, while the landlord argued the motions were litigated and the record supports the decision for possession and unpaid rent.
In a pro se appeal, appellant Amir Shakhnovich told the court the housing court erred on the eve of trial by ruling that two statutory counterclaims under Chapter 186 (§§14 and 15/15B) were not supported by the pleadings or were subsumed into quiet-enjoyment claims, by quashing subpoenas for his minor daughter’s medical and school records, and by narrowing jury…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
