Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court reviews registry-classification and denial of expert funds
Summary
Counsel for a registrant challenged the registry board’s classification and denial of funds for an expert, arguing that factor analyses and actuarial instruments (Stable-2007, Static-99) were misapplied and that the board relied on science not admitted below; board counsel defended the hearing examiner’s findings as supported by substantial evidence.
The Appeals Court heard argument in a case challenging a registry classification and the denial of funds to obtain an expert evaluation. Edward Gauthier, for the registrant identified in the record as John Doe, argued that certain risk-assessment factors (including repetitive and compulsive behavior under "factor 37") are not supported by admissible science as applied by the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
