Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Residents question alley resurfacing and funding after Riverview ADA and alley work accepted
Summary
A resident raised concerns that Clay Street work was listed under the residential alley resurfacing program and that ARPA funds were not used as believed; City Engineer Brian Chad said the work was paid with general-obligation bonds and had been bundled to lower costs.
A public comment from a Clay Street resident prompted council discussion about how a recent paving project was categorized and funded.
Resident Cheryl Shagnath (transcribed elsewhere in the record as Cheryl Shama) said work near Clay Street was listed in the residential alley resurfacing program even though that location has no alleys, questioned whether ARPA funds were used, and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
