Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cdbg Caper topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Grants Pass council acknowledges 2024-5 CDBG CAPER, records program outcomes and expenditures

Grants Pass City Council · December 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council accepted the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2024-5 CAPER after staff presented expenditures and program accomplishments including eviction prevention, youth services and ADA improvements; no public comments were received and the council voted to acknowledge and accept the report.

Grants Pass City staff presented the City—s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2024-5 CAPER and the City Council voted to acknowledge and accept the report.

Bradley Clark, community development staff, told the council the city had $381,003.98 in regular CDBG funding plus prior-year carryover for a program total of $548,853. For the October 1, 2024—September 30, 2025 expenditure period staff reported $414,010 spent in program year 2024, including $209,335 for rehabilitation and housing, $56,580 for public facilities, $55,743 for public services, and $87,237 for administration and planning.

Clark highlighted outcomes the CAPER attributes to CDBG investments: seven households saved from eviction or utility loss; 1,213 youth served by combined partners (Boys & Girls Club, Hearts With a Mission, Maslow Project); 30 people assisted by Welcome Home in Oregon; 16 people supported with microenterprise training; and 354 people served by Saint Vincent de Paul—s mobile food kitchen. Clark also credited funding for an ADA-inclusive playground at Redwood Elementary School and security doors at the Boys & Girls Club.

Councilors asked staff to clarify HUD—s statutory 15% cap on public services; Clark summarized the cap—s history and confirmed public-service providers named in the CAPER. The public hearing was opened for final comments and no audience members addressed the CAPER.

Joel moved to acknowledge and accept the CAPER; Eric seconded. A roll-call vote returned approval and staff was given direction to implement and report as required by the program.

The council action was procedural: the CAPER documents the prior year—s expenditures and community outcomes and does not itself change program allocations. Staff will proceed with the recordation of the CAPER and required federal reporting.