Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council consents to add parcel to Hunter Industrial Park after county explains FILO incentives
Summary
The council unanimously approved a resolution consenting to include property in the Multi County Business Park (Hunter Industrial Park) after a special guest from the county explained fee-in-lieu-of-tax (FILO) treatment, a 50% special-source revenue credit for up to 15 years, and a previously agreed revenue split that directs 25% of net fee payments to the city.
The City Council voted unanimously to consent to the inclusion of a parcel into a Multi County Business Park within the City of Lawrence — adding territory to Hunter Industrial Park — after a county representative explained how the multi-county park mechanism and fee-in-lieu-of-tax (FILO) arrangements work.
When a council member asked which property would be added, the presiding officer invited a special guest to explain. Unidentified Speaker 3 described the county’s multi-county park authority and said the change converts property from ad valorem tax status to fee-in-lieu payments. He explained the county’s incentive package for the project, saying in part, “one of the things that’s been offered to this particular project that’s expanding within the park is a 50% special source revenue credit… and they do that for a period of up to 15 years,” a structure intended to induce development.
The guest explained how fee payments and credits interact with a previously agreed revenue-distribution arrangement for multi-county park expansions: the model provides that the city receives 25% of net fee payments above credits, another 25% is deposited into a special tax allocation or administration fund for spending within the city, 25% goes to the county and 25% to the school district. The guest noted the city’s intergovernmental agreement with the county sets the distribution formula.
Council members asked no further substantive questions in the recorded segment; Speaker 1 called the question and the resolution consenting to the park expansion was approved by voice vote. The council’s approval included the understanding that the parcel would be treated under the same allocations and credits as the rest of Hunter Industrial Park.
The transcript does not list the parcel’s address or a project developer by name, and it does not record the final economic inducements or any developer commitments beyond the mentioned credit and the potential 15-year period.
