Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Staffing Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joliet council approves $156,500 citywide staffing study after heated debate
Summary
After debate and a failed motion to table, the Joliet City Council voted to award Raftelis a $156,500 contract to conduct a data‑driven citywide staffing and service‑level study. Supporters said the city needs an updated baseline after rapid growth; opponents warned consultants could recommend more positions.
The Joliet City Council voted Nov. 18 to award a $156,500 professional services agreement to Raftelis to perform a citywide staffing and service‑level study.
Council members debated whether to table the item so staff could review earlier consultant reports from 2016. One council member moved to table the contract citing previous studies and recent staffing increases; that motion failed on a roll call vote. The council then voted to approve the Raftelis contract.
Supporters of the study said Joliet has grown substantially since the last comprehensive staffing review and needs a data‑driven baseline. A councilmember said the city had 895 authorized positions in 2015 and “a little over 1,000 in 2024,” arguing that a current analysis is necessary to match staffing to service demands. Supporters described the study as a quantitative effort that will analyze operations and workloads rather than a subjective survey of opinions.
Opponents expressed concern that outside consultants commonly recommend adding positions and that the study could lead to additional hiring and higher long‑term payroll costs. One council member said recent payroll and overtime figures justify caution and questioned whether the city should spend $156,500 when some contracts remain unfinished.
Council members voting on the final approval recorded a majority in favor and the motion carried, allowing staff to execute the Raftelis agreement. Council members emphasized that any hiring or budget changes that result from the study would require later council approval.
The council did not act on outcomes of the study at this meeting; staff and council said they expect to review the report and consider any recommended changes in future budget or policy discussions.
