Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs battery lights, buried power and long‑term maintenance for park lighting
Summary
Board members debated battery‑powered poles priced at about $800 each with 8‑year warranties versus running underground power and meters, citing maintenance, energy reporting requirements, and long‑term costs; engineers will evaluate options and pricing.
Board discussion focused on lighting options for Keene’s park: a vendor quote presented by staff estimated $800 per pole for battery‑powered lights with a stated 10–12 year life and an 8‑year warranty. Board members and residents raised concerns about maintenance, replacement costs, light pollution and the benefits of running underground power to enable future upgrades.
One resident warned that battery solutions commit the city to future replacements, noting the board should ‘think long term on a park, a 30 year, 40 years’ horizon and prefer buried power if affordable. Staff noted wired options require transformers, meters and an upfront investment but would avoid recurring battery replacements; members suggested exploring partial phasing—running conduit or power to the darkest park areas first. There was also discussion of using existing highway poles or the cooperative’s metered utility poles to reduce upfront costs.
Staff recommended engineering evaluation to estimate how far a given allocation would carry conduit and transformers; members asked staff to return with cost‑per‑foot estimates and phased approaches. The board emphasized LED fixtures and timers as energy‑saving options tied to state reporting requirements about year‑over‑year energy reductions for municipalities.
