Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Downtown Landscape topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board forwards $5.8 million downtown landscape master plan to council without recommendation

Rapid City Public Works Meeting · November 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants proposed a downtown landscape master plan estimated at about $5.8 million (roughly $250,000 per intersection). The board discussed maintenance costs and parking meter placements and voted to move the plan to City Council without a recommendation.

Chris Worley, a landscape architect with Wizz Associates, presented a downtown landscape master plan to the Public Works board on Nov. 25 that covers the study area from East Boulevard to West Boulevard and Omaha Street to Kansas City Street.

Worley said the firm completed an inventory, public outreach and intersection‑by‑intersection master planning. "We did a site inventory...and identified what was lacking," he said, noting priorities identified through engagement included more street trees, improved safety and cleaner streets. He showed conceptual before‑and‑after illustrations and described design elements including planting beds, irrigation upgrades and boulders placed in planters to deter cutting through landscaped areas.

Worley presented an opinion‑of‑cost for full build‑out of the Main Street corridor and adjacent streets of about $5,800,000, which he said equates to roughly $250,000 per intersection. Council members asked whether parking meters would be removed; Worley said he was not proposing removing meters and that some renderings simply did not depict them.

Jeff (Parks & Rec Director) said the proposed designs aim for "low maintenance landscaping and improvements" but acknowledged there would be additional maintenance costs and that he did not have a precise annual maintenance estimate at the meeting.

After discussion about design, maintenance and funding options, the board moved the plan to City Council without recommendation, asking staff to investigate funding sources and maintenance implications. The board did not commit to funding; the item will be considered by the City Council.