Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts Van Heining Glen TIF, economic plan amid resident concerns over sewer tie-in costs
Summary
Norton City Council adopted tax-increment financing (TIF) ordinances for Van Heining Glen and the associated economic development plan but faced sustained debate over potential sewer tie-in costs for State Route 261 residents; council said tie-in costs will be set after final project design and discussed protections.
Norton City Council on Nov. 17 moved forward with tax-increment financing and related economic-development measures tied to a proposed Van Heining Glen housing development, adopting ordinance 120 25 (the TIF) and ordinance 1 01 20 25 (the economic development plan) after debate over resident protections for sewer tie-in costs.
Council members raised repeated concerns about how much existing homeowners along State Route 261 might be charged to tie into a new sewer line. "I don't think it's fair or right for a resident on 261 who had no choice in the matter to have to pay $3,040,000 dollars for a sewer they didn't ask for just so a developer can have his development," said Mister Towsley. Staff and council members said the per-household tie-in cost cannot be calculated until the sewer project cost is finalized and divided among households. One staff member said tie-in amounts are determined after project design.
Council discussed options to protect homeowners, including development agreements, setting a floor/ceiling for resident contributions, or addressing protections at the later plat/subdivision approval stage. Some members argued the economic development plan was not the right ordinance for setting tie-in protections, but that protections could be handled before final approvals.
Despite the concern, council adopted the economic development plan by roll call. The meeting transcript records at least two "no" votes on the economic plan (Mister Towsley and Mister Mowery), with the ordinance passing by majority.
Separately, council also advanced the Brookside Greens TIF (ordinance 91 20 25), which had a prior public hearing and no public speakers for or against.
What happens next: Staff will complete project design and cost estimates for sewer infrastructure; council indicated it can consider protective language in future development agreements or before final plat approval.
