Penny’s Place owner seeks clarity after zoning denial; board says procedural remedies available
Summary
After Penny’s Place was denied a zoning variance Dec. 4, a representative said the business had operated and been licensed for three years; the board said the denial rested on lack of zoning testimony and advised consulting staff and administrative remedies.
A representative for Penny’s Place told the DuPage County Zoning Board of Appeals on Dec. 4 that the restaurant had been in business and licensed for three years and questioned why the board denied the application.
The representative said the business had previously received approvals and sought clarification on options after the denial. The board’s chair replied that the application was denied because the applicant “didn’t present a case for zoning” and that zoning hearings evaluate the request as if the site were a new or ‘greenfield’ case; existing approvals from other departments do not by themselves satisfy the zoning standard. The chair advised the commenter to consult county staff about the administrative appeal process and said a court would typically ask whether administrative remedies had been exhausted.
The exchange underscored a recurring procedural point at the meeting: the board requires evidence and testimony specific to zoning standards (for example, demonstrating a qualifying practical difficulty). The representative indicated they intended to pursue information about appeals and process guidance from staff.
Next steps: the board suggested the business contact county staff for procedural assistance and to determine whether administrative remedies remain available before any court action.
