Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Neighbors oppose Steel Street abandonment, citing access and parking; petitioner says duplex will be for-sale

December 02, 2025 | Providence City, Providence County, Rhode Island


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors oppose Steel Street abandonment, citing access and parking; petitioner says duplex will be for-sale
At a Dec. 1 public hearing, residents and the petitioner clashed over a request by 161 Ridge LLC to abandon a portion of Steel Street south of Woodbine Street.

Nick Vasileff, who identified his address as 64 Evergreen Street, said Steel Street "is currently the only way that I can access the back of my house, without entering private property," and urged the committee to consider access problems. Barbara and Daryl Williams of 29 Woodbine Street told the committee they are concerned about existing parking pressure on Woodbine and nearby streets, noted York Street is not passable and said adding a duplex without clear parking would strain the neighborhood during winter and school months.

Dylan Connolly, the petitioner's representative, said he has communicated with several abutters and submitted correspondence from a neighboring owner who supports the abandonment with conditions. Connolly proposed abandoning 50% of the public right-of-way directly in front of his property to enable a side-by-side duplex with integral parking beneath the units, and said the product is intended for homeownership rather than rental. He said he will coordinate surveys, administrative subdivision filings, and easements with neighbors and city staff.

A tax assessor's office representative told the committee the office had not placed a value on the parcel because submissions did not clearly indicate how land would be allocated among abutters or whether abandonment could landlock other lots; staff flagged the need for clearer survey information before valuation. There was no formal vote recorded on the petition at the hearing; staff and the petitioner said they would continue outreach and provide survey and subdivision materials for further consideration.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee