Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Special Use Alcohol topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tampa council sends contested Davis Island alcohol permit back for revisions after wide public opposition
Summary
Residents near 340 E. Davis Blvd. urged denial of a special‑use permit for on‑site alcohol at an ice‑cream/restaurant project, citing proximity, noise, parking and public‑health risks. Applicant agreed to tighten hours and remove outdoor furniture; council treated the item as first reading so staff can add conditions before second reading on Dec. 4.
An applicant seeking a small‑venue alcohol license at 340 E. Davis Boulevard faced extensive public opposition at Tampa City Council, and council elected to treat the measure as a first reading with conditions to be finalized before a Dec. 4 second reading.
Neighbors and civic‑association leaders said the proposal — which would allow beer and wine sales and an expanded outdoor area — would intrude on adjacent single‑family homes. Debbie Zomerman and other Davis Island Civic Association representatives urged the council to deny AB 2‑25‑20 in part because they said the record lacks evidence that the use is of city‑ or area‑wide importance and because a requested parking waiver was added between readings. Registered nurse Scott DeFriedes told the council he reviewed health literature and said the proximity of alcohol service to homes could harm sleep, stress and cardiovascular health for residents within the 250‑foot notification radius.
The applicant, represented by Alex (Lehi) Shaler, told the council the site plan changes required between first and second reading were completed, that staff has discretion to set applications, and that commitments already discussed at first reading remain in place. Shaler said the outdoor area would be used as a children's play area, that no amplified sound would be allowed, that no tables and chairs would be placed outdoors, and that alcohol sales would end at 9 p.m. on weekdays and 10 p.m. on weekends (he said the site plan had an earlier, inconsistent listing but that the applicant would revise it to reflect the lower hours).
Council accepted a motion to read the ordinance as a first reading and to allow the applicant and staff to incorporate the clarified hours and the no‑outdoor‑furniture commitment prior to second reading. Councilman Viera read the ordinance for first reading; the council recorded the first‑reading vote as carried and scheduled second reading and adoption for Dec. 4, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. in City Council Chambers.
What happens next: Staff will incorporate the hours and outdoor‑furniture restrictions into the site plan and the ordinance language; the council will consider any added conditions and the final ordinance on Dec. 4. Public commenters asked for the opportunity to respond if the applicant adds new evidence at rebuttal; the council’s first‑reading posture preserves that chance at second reading.
Speakers quoted (selected): “If you approve this request, you will be stealing the rights residents are afforded via the clear language within the city’s code,” Debbie Zomerman told the council. Applicant Alex Shaler said the proposal includes a commitment “to end alcohol sales at 9 on the weekdays and at 10 on the weekends” and that the proposal “is a very modest application.”
Timing: The council set second reading and adoption for Dec. 4, 2025 at 10:00 a.m.
