Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Playground topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs playground placement, $10,000 committee contribution as district converts student center to childcare
Summary
District staff outlined plans to convert the student center to a childcare facility and presented alternative playground layouts after a county property committee objected to the original location; the district’s property committee authorized up to $10,000 toward the playground, and board members discussed safety, visibility and an estimated extra excavation cost of up to $20,000.
Rice Lake — District staff told the board Aug. 25 that plans to convert the student center into a childcare center are moving forward and that playground equipment for children 2 and older has been ordered, but the placement of that playground has proved contentious.
District Administrator Randy described three layout options and regulatory limits that affect siting, including a maximum 1% slope for installed equipment and the need for fire-suppression work in the building conversion. He said the property committee voted to support alternate playground plans and to contribute up to $10,000 toward the site work that the committee can authorize without referring the matter to the county board. “It’ll be open to the public,” Randy said of the finished playground, noting gates would be used but the site would be publicly accessible outside childcare hours.
Board members and staff debated trade-offs between visibility, slope, excavation and cost. Randy told the board moving the playground to satisfy the county committee could increase excavation and site costs by “upwards of $20,000,” a sum some members said the district should not bear alone. One board member suggested taking the dispute to the full county board for a public decision, saying the county should cover additional costs if it insists on a different layout.
Concerns raised during the discussion included safety and supervision if a playground is sited where staff or windows do not provide direct sight lines, potential impacts on the trail aesthetic, and the presence of utilities or a storm drain in proposed alternative locations. Board members urged staff to explore modest design changes such as an L-shaped layout to shift equipment away from steep slopes and to pursue any available exceptions to seasonal construction timing; staff said the playground equipment is due to arrive in days and that timelines are constrained by weather and required systems.
The board did not take a final vote on the playground placement during the Aug. 25 meeting; the discussion provided direction to staff and affirmed the property committee’s authority to contribute up to $10,000 toward the project. Next steps identified by staff included continued negotiation with the county property committee and confirming site work that avoids utility conflicts and meets slope and safety requirements.
