Auditor gives Chisago Lakes a clean FY2025 opinion; general fund balance rises to about 7%

CHISAGO LAKES SCHOOL DISTRICT Board · December 12, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

External auditor Abdo reported an unmodified (clean) opinion on the district’s FY2025 financial statements, noted a modified single-audit finding for the child nutrition cluster, and said the general fund balance rose by about $3.3 million to roughly 7.06% of expenditures, within board policy.

John Stachel, supervisor with audit firm Abdo, presented the fiscal-year 2025 financial-statement audit and told the board the district received an unmodified (clean) opinion: “we did issue the district unmodified opinion, or you might think of that as a clean audit opinion.”

Stachel said the audit was performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and included testing of internal controls and Minnesota legal compliance; he reported the auditors found no instances of legal noncompliance in the areas they tested. Because the district’s federal expenditures exceed the single-audit threshold, Abdo also performed single-audit procedures and reported a modified outcome for the child nutrition cluster tests.

Key performance indicators in the presentation included an enrollment decline of roughly 49 students from FY24 to FY25 and a general-fund unassigned balance that increased to about 7.06% of expenditures, which Stachel noted lies within the board’s 7–10% policy range. The auditor also summarized that actual activity for FY25 increased the general fund balance by about $3,300,000 compared with a budgeted net decrease of $1,100,000, driven by slightly higher state revenues and some underspending in programs including special education.

The presentation included a regional and statewide comparison of revenues and expenditures per pupil and an overview of outstanding general-obligation bonds (about $53,000,000 outstanding) with projected principal and interest payments; interest obligations were summarized at roughly $12,000,000 for the referenced period.

Board members thanked business-office staff for the work that contributed to the audit results, and several asked follow-up questions about how comparables were selected and how district spending levels relate to outcomes. The auditor cautioned that district-to-district comparisons can be influenced by differences in tax bases and program offerings.

Action taken later in the meeting: the board moved, seconded and recorded a voice vote of 'aye' to approve the audit report (motion and second at open session; roll call recorded elsewhere in the meeting for other items).