Committee questions Moraga Country Club lease after audit shows low lease revenue

Town of Moraga Audit and Finance Committee · December 10, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members flagged a roughly $7,000 monthly lease payment for town-owned land used by Moraga Country Club, called it "insanely low" and asked staff to review lease terms. Staff said the lease includes limited public access and proposed adding a lease review to the 2026 work list.

A town lease with Moraga Country Club drew sharp questions at the Audit & Finance Committee meeting Dec. 2 after staff noted a monthly lease revenue figure of about $7,000 in the audit schedules.

"We are required to report on our leases, and our lease with the country club is a monthly revenue of about $7,000," a staff member said when the committee asked where the figure appeared in the report. A committee member responded: "That's insanely low for a for-profit enterprise," and asked whether the arrangement could constitute a gift of public funds.

Town staff and council members told the committee the agreement dates to the late 1980s and includes provisions that provide a public benefit: limited resident access to the putting area and driving range and occasional access to play. The town manager said he recalled the lease terms had been structured to avoid gift-of-public-funds issues at the time.

"We can go back and look at the current terms of the existing lease to see if that can be adjusted," the town manager said; staff said they will add a lease review to the 2026 work plan, subject to future council direction.

Why it matters: The committee’s discussion highlights two competing interests — maximizing public revenue for town services and preserving negotiated community uses embedded in a decades-old lease. Committee members called for a formal staff review to determine whether the lease terms remain consistent with current policy and law.

Next steps: Staff agreed to pull the original lease documents, research historical terms and present options for renegotiation or other actions to the council or a future committee meeting.