Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Meigs County Commission to reject proposed jail plan citing $125 million lifetime cost; commissioners take no action
Summary
Public commenters at a Meigs County Commission meeting urged officials to reject a proposal for a new, expanded jail—citing a $25–30 million construction estimate and a claimed $125 million lifetime cost—and asked for independent financial review; commissioners deferred action and will present to state officials Dec. 3.
Meigs County residents pressed commissioners to abandon plans for a large new jail, saying the project would saddle homeowners and small businesses with lasting tax increases.
"A new jail may cost $25,000,000 to $30,000,000 to build, but over a lifetime of debt, staffing, health care, transportation, utilities, operations, maintenance, the real price exceeds $125,000,000," said a public commenter during the meeting, urging the commission to "reject any plan to raise property taxes for this $125,000,000 plan." The commenter said taxpayers deserve independent verification of the financial claims before any borrowing decision.
Kurt Deering, who identified himself during public comment, said his family had paid roughly $150,000 in county taxes over 50 years and argued many residents "do not utilize" county services. He suggested redirecting $450,000 in annexation or payout funds and pursuing phased repairs estimated in public comment at about $6,000,000 rather than constructing a new facility.
Martha Scott, a retired FBI employee who said she has applied for jail-related grants in the past, urged commissioners to form an exploratory committee to pursue outside funding. Commissioners and staff replied that, according to what was discussed at the meeting, most grants discussed are not available to pay for construction of an entirely new jail but may cover incidental equipment and supplies.
Other speakers cited national guidance and local population figures and called a proposed 130-bed expansion excessive for the county’s needs.
Commission discussion and a previously distributed memorandum and USDA presentation were reviewed; during that exchange commissioners said they planned a Dec. 3 presentation to state officials in Nashville to seek time and consideration. After hearing public comment and staff discussion, the commission took no action on the memorandum or related proposal at this meeting.
The meeting record shows commissioners did not adopt a financing plan or authorize construction at this session; any formal borrowing, detailed cost estimates, grant applications or further votes would be future steps for the commission.
