Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Commissary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners authorize jail commissary contract with Victus, citing lower prices and higher commission
Summary
County staff recommended and the board authorized a commissary contract with Victus (over Summit) citing better inmate pricing, higher commission to the county (reported at 15% vs. 2%), and vendor responsiveness; board authorized 'Andy' to sign the contract.
County staff on the phone recommended that the Clay County Board of Commissioners authorize a contract with Victus to operate the jail commissary, and the board approved the authorization.
Andy (identified only by first name during the meeting and participating remotely) told commissioners the procurement review compared two primary commissary vendors: Victus and Summit. Andy said Victus offered faster responsiveness, substantially lower prices for inmates and a higher commission rate to the county (he reported a 15% commission from Victus versus 2% from Summit). He said the county has worked with Summit in the jail kitchen but concluded Victus provided better commissary pricing and county commission.
Commissioner S5 moved to authorize Andy to sign the commissary contract; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The board discussed concerns about captive consumers and exploitative contracts in general, and S9 described the county’s practice of either remitting commissary commission to the general fund or retaining it for jail-related expenses.
The transcript includes inconsistent spellings of the vendor name (Victus and Invictus appear in different lines). The board record approved authorization to execute the contract; the transcript does not show the full contract text or final signed date.
