Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Study Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clayton County Awards $195,700 Contract for Countywide Housing Study to KB Advisory Group

Clayton County Board of Commissioners · December 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved awarding ITB/RFP 25‑121 — a countywide housing assessment and strategy — to KB Advisory Group (Atlanta) for $195,700, funded from the general fund; commissioners discussed process and prior studies before the approval.

The Clayton County Board of Commissioners voted Dec. 2 to award a countywide housing assessment and strategy contract (ITB/RFP 25‑121) to KB Advisory Group of Atlanta for $195,700, with funding to come from the county general fund.

Miss Rogers, presenting the Community and Economic Development Department recommendation, said the valuation tabulation, department memo and draft agreement were attached for board review and that the chair or designee should be authorized to execute the contract and the interim CFO should amend the budget.

"The recommendation is to award the contract to KB Advisory Group… The total cost is $195,700," Miss Rogers said.

Vice Chair (Commissioner Reeves) and other commissioners pressed staff about process and prior studies, asking at what point the board is involved in scope development for large, long‑term studies. Dietrich Stanford, the COO, said operational departments typically develop scopes with central services but offered to query the board for front‑end input when future studies are scoped.

Commissioners also discussed that this is the county's first concentrated housing study for all cities and unincorporated areas; staff said the study ties in with Community Development Block Grant–style planning work and other grant uses for addressing homelessness.

After discussion, a motion and second were made and the board approved the award.

The board did not provide a timeline for contractor deliverables in the public discussion recorded in the meeting. The department's recommendation and contract documents were attached to the meeting records for further detail.