Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Perris introduces local just‑cause eviction ordinance, keeps two‑month relocation assistance and reverts vesting to state thresholds

December 10, 2025 | Perris, Riverside County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Perris introduces local just‑cause eviction ordinance, keeps two‑month relocation assistance and reverts vesting to state thresholds
Perris city council on Dec. 9 introduced a local ordinance to implement just‑cause eviction protections linked to AB 1482 while adding local provisions that the council said are more protective for tenants in certain respects.

The ordinance as introduced keeps two months’ relocation assistance for qualifying no‑fault evictions but (after member debate) reverts the vesting thresholds to the state standard — meaning just‑cause protection vests when all tenants have lawfully occupied a unit for 12 months or when at least one tenant has occupied for 24 months, rather than the shorter local timeline in the earlier draft.

Why it matters: City staff and supporters said stronger local tenant protections provide stability for renters living paycheck to paycheck and protect vulnerable households; opponents including the California Apartment Association and Inland Valleys Association of Realtors said the proposed local changes layered requirements beyond the state law and risked discouraging investment and harming small “mom‑and‑pop” landlords.

What staff said: Michelle Ogawa, the city’s director of Economic Development and Workforce, summarized edits since an earlier reading: multilingual notices, a reset of the applicability window (staff initially proposed shorter vesting, later adjusted), revision of the at‑fault and no‑fault definitions, and an increase in relocation assistance to two months’ rent for certain no‑fault evictions. Staff recommended that council introduce the ordinance and continue the public process.

Public comments: Tenant advocates such as Luz Gallegos and representatives of community land trusts urged immediate implementation and higher relocation payments in some cases. Industry voices including Victor Cao (California Apartment Association) and Paul Herrera (Inland Valleys Association of Realtors) argued the draft expanded state rules, would create perpetual tenancy in practice and could reduce housing investment.

Council action: Mayor Pro Tem Rapp moved to introduce the ordinance with an amendment reverting the vesting period to state thresholds while retaining two months relocation assistance; Councilman Corona seconded. The motion carried on a 4‑1 roll call: Rapp, Nava, Corona and Vargas — Yes; Vallejo — No.

Next steps: The ordinance was introduced for first reading; staff will return with final edits and findings for future consideration and adoption.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal