Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board reviews middle‑school track and field options, cost estimates up to about $2.7M

December 09, 2025 | Spearfish School District 40-2, School Districts, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board reviews middle‑school track and field options, cost estimates up to about $2.7M
The Spearfish School District board reviewed options and updated cost estimates for the Creekside middle‑school track and field project.

Superintendent (Speaker 8) said contractor Mammoth proposed scope adjustments — notably using artificial turf in the D‑zones at the ends of the football field instead of full track surfacing — that reduce excavation and cost. He presented a range of choices: a simple 2‑inch overlay with engineering (previous estimate updated) roughly $404,150 including about $50,000 in engineering costs; an overlay plus a rubberized coating and striping adding roughly $260,000 (bringing a subtotal toward $660,000); a more complete rebuild including long jump pits, bleacher pad and perimeter work estimated about $1,000,528 (down from a prior $1.85M estimate); and a full track plus new artificial turf option estimated about $2.742M (previously nearly $3.1M).

The superintendent noted additional lifetime and maintenance considerations for turf and track: turf replacement currently estimated (in the presentation) at about $500,000 with escalation, periodic resurfacing costs in the tens or hundreds of thousands, and roughly 2.5% annual cost escalation for planning assumptions. He also described a potential fundraising model that could include selling field advertising panels and in‑kind savings if the city accepts excavated soils (the presenter said that hauling soils could reduce costs by about $78,000 and that turf supply timing and price escalation argue for earlier decisions).

Board members discussed sponsorship and fundraising possibilities and asked for an interactive spreadsheet with detailed line items; the superintendent said that will be provided and recommended placing the item on the January agenda for a possible decision.

No binding contract or appropriation was approved at the meeting; the discussion was informational and preparatory for future board action.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee