Board reviews middle‑school track and field options, cost estimates up to about $2.7M

Spearfish School District 40-2 Board of Education · December 9, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board heard alternative proposals for the Creekside middle‑school track and field, including a lower‑cost 2‑inch overlay (~$404K) and a full track+artificial turf option estimated at about $2.74M; the superintendent recommended further discussion and possible fundraising before a January decision.

The Spearfish School District board reviewed options and updated cost estimates for the Creekside middle‑school track and field project.

Superintendent (Speaker 8) said contractor Mammoth proposed scope adjustments — notably using artificial turf in the D‑zones at the ends of the football field instead of full track surfacing — that reduce excavation and cost. He presented a range of choices: a simple 2‑inch overlay with engineering (previous estimate updated) roughly $404,150 including about $50,000 in engineering costs; an overlay plus a rubberized coating and striping adding roughly $260,000 (bringing a subtotal toward $660,000); a more complete rebuild including long jump pits, bleacher pad and perimeter work estimated about $1,000,528 (down from a prior $1.85M estimate); and a full track plus new artificial turf option estimated about $2.742M (previously nearly $3.1M).

The superintendent noted additional lifetime and maintenance considerations for turf and track: turf replacement currently estimated (in the presentation) at about $500,000 with escalation, periodic resurfacing costs in the tens or hundreds of thousands, and roughly 2.5% annual cost escalation for planning assumptions. He also described a potential fundraising model that could include selling field advertising panels and in‑kind savings if the city accepts excavated soils (the presenter said that hauling soils could reduce costs by about $78,000 and that turf supply timing and price escalation argue for earlier decisions).

Board members discussed sponsorship and fundraising possibilities and asked for an interactive spreadsheet with detailed line items; the superintendent said that will be provided and recommended placing the item on the January agenda for a possible decision.

No binding contract or appropriation was approved at the meeting; the discussion was informational and preparatory for future board action.