Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riviera Beach council adopts civil‑citation ordinance and fee schedule after debate on senior protections and liens

City Council of Riviera Beach · December 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council approved Ordinance No. 4297 to add civil citation procedures to code enforcement and adopted the companion fee schedule (Resolution 181‑25) on Dec. 3. Council members pressed staff to build safeguards for seniors and owner‑occupants and asked for a hardship lien‑waiver process and clearer reduction formulas.

RIVIERA BEACH, Fla. — The Riviera Beach City Council on Dec. 3 approved changes to local code enforcement intended to speed compliance by adding a civil‑citation mechanism and a fee schedule to back it up.

The ordinance (No. 4297) — presented at second reading by Clarence Sermons, director of development services — adds a targeted table of violations eligible for civil citations, clarifies the city’s ability to collect assessed fines and makes appeal fees refundable to residents who prevail in challenge proceedings. “Our goal with code compliance is always to get compliance first, not to impose fees and liens,” Sermons said.

Council discussion focused on how enforcement would affect seniors, homeowners who live in their houses and absentee landlords. Council members repeatedly asked staff to preserve officers’ discretion and to add tools that help owner‑occupants avoid long‑term financial damage from liens. Sermons said the city already emphasizes education first, issues notices and typically gives 30 days to correct violations before referral to a special magistrate; fines and liens are reserved for property owners who fail to respond or whose properties are abandoned.

Several council members urged changes beyond the ordinance itself. One called for a council authority to waive liens in hardship cases; another asked staff to propose a multiplier or formula that would reduce fines for homesteaded owner‑occupants. Sermons said a separate part of the code already contains a formula for fine reductions and a small grant fund that can be used to help elderly residents bring properties into compliance, but he agreed to return with further code amendments and process recommendations.

Public comment during the associated fee‑schedule debate reflected deep community concern about selective enforcement and the burden fines can create. Multiple speakers described experiences of elderly neighbors and longtime residents who felt targeted; others urged stricter enforcement against commercial properties that, they said, have not been maintained.

The companion resolution adopting the fee schedule (Resolution 181‑25) passed on a unanimous roll call. Council members said they expect staff to return with recommended refinements — including clearer hardship procedures and possible separate commercial fee tiers — at a future meeting.

What happens next: Staff will draft follow‑up amendments and process changes (including possible lien‑waiver language) and return to council for additional consideration. The code update takes effect as provided in the ordinance.