CB2 Landmarks pushes for a building-wide master plan after tenant architect proposes tilt-and-turn windows on Broadway

Manhattan Community Board 2 Landmarks Committee · December 15, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A tenant architect proposed simulated double-hung and tilt-and-turn windows for 9th-floor units at 491 Broadway/446 Broom; committee members said they cannot approve piecemeal changes without a building master plan and directed staff to pursue coordinated options.

Chris Teeter, the tenant’s architect, presented window replacement plans for a 9th-floor apartment at 491 Broadway and 446 Broom Street. He described the Broom Street proposal as "a simulated double hung" and said the Broadway façade would receive tilt-and-turn casements with an optional bar to give the appearance of a double-hung sash.

Committee members repeatedly raised the absence of a building-wide master plan. One commissioner told the applicant bluntly: "We can't approve this without a master plan, period." Members argued that approving different window systems on the same building would risk an inconsistent façade over time and recommended that the landlord present a cohesive strategy for both facades before staff-level approval.

The applicant said there is no existing master plan and offered to lead coordination with other owners and future applicants; he also supplied an alternate that would visually mimic a double-hung appearance if the commission preferred. The committee moved the subject to the business session to draft a recommendation emphasizing coordinated, historically sympathetic replacements (double-hung wood windows or close visual equivalents) rather than casement/tilt-and-turn solutions that open outward and change the character of the façade.

No formal vote was recorded in the transcript; the committee’s direction was to require a master plan or equivalent building-level coordination for future approvals.