State flags gaps in Woodland comprehensive plan; city staff say revisions are coming

City of Woodland City Council · December 16, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The city told council that the Washington State Department of Commerce identified missing greenhouse‑gas reduction measures, inadequate housing inventory by income bands, and insufficient analysis of racially disparate barriers; staff said the city has been preparing for required updates and will follow up with revised plan elements.

Woodland — At the Dec. 15 council meeting, the mayor reported receiving a letter from the Washington State Department of Commerce that identified several deficiencies in Woodland’s comprehensive plan.

According to the mayor (not named in the transcript), Commerce found that Woodland’s climate‑resilience element lacks an explicit greenhouse‑gas reduction plan; the housing inventory does not break out supply by income bands (low, middle, high); and the plan does not adequately analyze racially disparate barriers or describe code changes to remove those barriers. The mayor said the state asked the city to return with revisions addressing those topics.

Travis, a city staff member who spoke to council, said the city has been preparing for these updates for several years and noted that Cowlitz County and Clark County deadlines for updates may influence Woodland’s timing. Travis told the council that while delaying some updates might buy time, the state still requires compliance with growth-management law and the city will need to update the plan.

The mayor and staff said they will meet and research next steps, and they emphasized concern about whether state compliance requirements could affect future grant eligibility for local projects. No formal vote occurred on the comp‑plan item; staff will return with proposed revisions and next steps in a future meeting.

The council discussion highlighted the tension between a broad (holistic) approach to housing policy and the state’s request for more granular income‑band analysis and explicit equity provisions.