Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident petition urges Woodland to study enclosed dog park; council raises funding and maintenance concerns
Summary
A Woodland resident presented over 500 signatures asking the city to consider an enclosed dog park. Council members welcomed the idea but repeatedly raised insurance, maintenance and funding concerns and suggested pursuing nonprofit partnerships or grants rather than full city funding.
A Woodland resident known as Jamie asked the City Council on Dec. 1 to begin a formal conversation about establishing an enclosed dog park, presenting a vision board and saying she had collected over 500 signatures from residents and supporters. "Plus a tired dog is a good dog and a good dog is a good neighbor," Jamie told the council in public comment.
The mayor and council members expressed support for the concept but outlined practical concerns about cost, liability and ongoing maintenance. The mayor said the city’s total annual property and liability insurance runs "about $600,000 or $700,000" and warned that adding an asset the city owns would likely raise insurance costs and require funding for cleanup and upkeep. Council members and staff noted prior informal discussions about potential sites, including a location near AMPM, and cautioned that past neighborhood parks had failed when a few residents were left to maintain them.
Council suggested alternatives to full city funding, including partnering with nonprofits or applying for grants. Staff and a council member offered to collect leads on grant opportunities; a council member invited the public to send potential grant notices to city staff for review. The mayor encouraged the petitioner to continue community engagement and suggested staff (including Travis) could explore easement or nonprofit partnership options for sites adjacent to utility easements.
No formal motion or vote was taken on a dog park at the Dec. 1 meeting; council members recommended follow-up research and possible planning-commission or staff-level work to identify funding and sites.
The council thanked the resident for bringing community interest forward and suggested staff return with findings, including estimates of insurance impact and potential grant partners, before placing a formal item on a future agenda.
